WATERLOO DIGITAL ZINE
WATERLOO DIGITAL ZINE
DESIGN AS PROTEST COLLECTIVE
The DAP (Design As Protest) Collective is an anti-racist, non-hierarchical, action-based collective dedicated to advancing Design Justice in the built environment. We are BIPOC designers mobilizing strategies to dismantle the privilege and power structures that have co-opted architecture and design as tools of oppression.
DAP exists to hold the design professions accountable in reversing the violence and injustice that architecture, landscape architecture, design, and urban planning practices have inflicted upon Black people and communities of color. DAP champions the radical vision of racial, social, and cultural reparation through the process and outcomes of Design Justice.
Design As Protest was started in 2015 and reactivated as the DAP Collective in June 2020. DAP organizers engage virtually and across the United States, UK, and Canada.
DESIGN JUSTICE DEMANDS
Divest & Reallocate Police Funding
Cease the Implementation of Hostile Architecture & Landscapes
Abolish Carceral Spaces
Restructure Design’s Relationship to Power, Capital & our Labor
Center Community Leadership in Design & Planning Processes
Create, Protect & Reclaim Public Space Through Liveratory Planning & Policy
Cultivate Anti-Racist Visions for Affordable & Just Neighborhoods
Preserve and Invest in Black, Brown, Indigenous, and Asian Cultural Spaces
Create Anti-Racist Models of Design Education, Training & Licensing
COMMUNITY AGREEMENTS
We started the process to create community agreements shortly after we formed. Our community agreements were crowd sourced through an anonymous form, then DAP Care + Coordination categorized and distilled them into nine points. We brought them back to the general collective for discussion and approval, and have used them ever since. We start every DAP core meeting by naming a few community agreements and examples of how they have shown up in our lives.
In many organizing spaces, community agreements create trust and promote open dialogue and conflict resolution. By entering a space with community agreements, it is easier to hold everyone accountable to their actions and to start on the same page. Community agreements empowers members with terms and framings of behavior to discuss when conflict does arise.
DAP COMMUNITY AGREEMENTS
Acknowledge Privilege/Harm
Move at the Speed of Trust
Co-op not Co-opt
Growth Mindset
What is Said in Here, Stays in Here
Respect the Mic
Collective Self Care
Non-Hierarchical Relationships
Bias Towards Action
HOW TO CREATE YOUR OWN COMMUNITY AGREEMENTS
Start by discussing values, and naming what you want in the space and what should stay out of the space.
In a smaller group, the values and summarize into discrete points.
Bring list back to the larger group to discuss and edit, then agree to implement.
Use agreements to open meetings and use them as a starting point to navigate conflict and decision-making.
ORGANIZING WITHIN ACADEMIA
The university campus has long been seen as a place where progressive politics flourish. After all, as a space dedicated to expanding one’s mind, it is not surprising to think that students would lead the charge on pushing beyond the current line of thought. The term known as the overton window is a model for understanding how ideas in society change over time and influence politics. What is innate within spaces of organizing and spaces of protest is a push towards the next progressive window and line of thought. As curious and energized individuals, student organizers have historically left a mark by questioning the status quo with new schools of thought. As a grassroots organization filled with both students, educators, researchers, and various spatial practitioners, Design As Protest came to organize a series of how-to-guides in creating its Anti-Racist Design Justice Index (ARDJI). The campaign to create the ARDJI will be investigated within DAP’s workshop at Waterloo, but the results of creating this tool can be reaped in some of the strategies suggested in the following section. This how-to guide is from the Anti-Racist Design Justice Index with responses from the Design Educations Action Survey for students, alum, and faculty allies organizing at their institutions. The how-to-guide has been adapted in order to ensure that all notes are applicable to the Canadian context.
BEST STRATEGIES WHEN ORGANIZING IN YOUR INSTITUTIONS:
Set boundaries and remember that you can say “No!” - students have been dealing with exhaustion and are spread thin due to understaffed and unresponsive administration that asks more of its students, having in them take on the responsibility of carrying actions forward. It’s not the student's job to do this and it’s not sustainable (especially without receiving compensation). You do not have to respond to every ask. Boundaries can be set by explicitly providing demands that address the power dynamics that exist between students and those in power.
Build solidarity between institutions - we require large scale change and accountability - building solidarity allows for momentum to be sustained, guidance, leadership, and data to be shared, and the creation of a support system where folks can collectively learn and grow.
Asking for external help outside of insitutions - reach out to larger organizations in design justice work to facilitate and co-organize workshops to brainstorm anti-racist design pedagogies in academic institutions.
Keep things anonymous when you can - sharing experiences or correspondences anonymously online has allowed room for students to be taken seriously by those in positions of authority and gain more support from the larger community without focusing on the associated individuals (and also protecting them from more harm).
Build resources to navigate organizing and build institutional memory - with the lack of guidance and support from a student's institution, and keeping in mind that admin won’t have the answers or know how to change (as they likely were taught through the system we’re trying to redesign), creating "how-to" guides (like this one) with guidance an actionable items specific to your institutions is a resource for many beginning and continuing to navigate their schools and is a good way to support work continuing as students graduate.
Organize and strategize plans of action collectively - form a collective (internally and externally) to create strategic plans and goals to work towards. Breaking down actions into categories might be effective - it can help folks doing the work to see what can be done without the administration's support and make things slightly less overwhelming. It’s also helpful to provide multiple ways for people to jump in to support and divide up tasks in a way that allows people to hop in based on their capacities.
Uplift ongoing opportunities for unlearning and education - so many events, trainings, webinars, and discussions are held by a number of wonderful organizations and individuals - re-direct people to these spaces and opportunities - you don’t have to be the sole provider of spaces for unlearning.
Remember not to bear all the responsibility for change by yourself - We can't feel the pressure of the responsibility to completely change our schools and departments alone. Especially as a Black, Brown, Indigenous, or Asian person, it is not your responsibility to carry all this weight alone. Taking up space is an act of resistance in itself - your first responsibility is to yourself, to take care of yourself and get through school.
Leverage support from your allies and networks - Larger networks of students and passionate alumni already have had an impact, both in sharing ideas and in maintaining energy. However, there is also a need to establish shared priorities and industry best practices that otherwise hesitant establishment folks can get behind. Building allyships with local and national non-design BIPOC groups is important. External networks (from firms, organizations, alumni, companies, other institutions) and their connection can really influence the direction of the institutions due to "reputation and image", and serve as a general means of support.
Remember that we have agency in the spaces we occupy - don’t let anyone convince you otherwise.
CHALLENGES YOU MIGHT FACE WHEN ORGANIZING:
Difficulty Garnering Involvement - organizing digitally has made getting consistent involvement challenging. Lack of interest from white students and others that might not think that they should care about any of this/know about these efforts also is a challenge, especially as it might leave BIPOC folks to do most of this work
Lack of transparency being used as an evasive tactic - Limiting the information available hinders students' abilities to advocate for change and is a tactic used to prevent students and members of the wider community from holding institutions accountable. Many students are struggling to hold their institutions accountable because there is no feedback loop allowing for information to be disseminated widely as changes are made (or not made) - sometimes decisions are only revealed after they are made, without leaving any room for feedback or input.
Lack of Institutional Support - often using reasoning such as: lack of money, college-wide support, or buy-in for long term actions + insisting that work is happening. Remember: where institutions place their money is a statement of their values.
Reaching Capacity - when advocating for yourself while juggling academic work, you’ll find that you reach capacity quickly. Faculty and administrators ask for student involvement while not recognizing their responsibility to their studies.
Emotional Exhaustion - students are being pressured to perform a huge amount of emotional labor for their institutions. This is rarely compensated, incredibly exhausting, and such forms of emotional exploitation often lead to widespread burnout before significant structural changes are implemented.
Denial and Complacency from the masses - A large amount of re-education has to happen and those in power provide a challenge by not letting go of their ego and elitist behaviours and claiming the bare minimum amount of work as enough.
Appropriation + erasure of students organizing efforts - especially in PWI’s, institutions might take BIPOC organizing efforts that they were not involved in as achievement of their own merits
Continuation of “studio culture” and Problematic Behaviors in the Profession - one of the biggest obstacles for design education is grappling with the longstanding professional ties with capitalism, and by extension, racism. Without dismantling these professional ties, design education will continue to prop them up by default. Most importantly, the nature of "studio culture" creates problematic and harmful spaces for students. Students shouldn't be trained to learn architecture the same way it's always been as that continues the cycles of exclusivity and elitism, which essentially keep people out.
Increased Tokenization in efforts to reconcile - the creation of committees where BIPOC students are asked to serve is one way that institutions have put BIPOC students in a position of exploitative labor
Trauma - PTSD … no joke
FOR ADMINISTRATION, FACULTY, AND STAFF:
Instead of getting frustrated about why students don’t want to step up and talk about their experiences, instead, ask why they don’t want to talk about their experiences
There won’t be a time in the near future where this work will be done - there’s always more to do.
There’s always room to grow, learn and unlearn.
Students need to be monetarily compensated (academic credits are not acceptable payment). Student efforts are undervalued, anti-racist efforts and work in academic spaces should not solely be the responsibility of BIPOC communities. Students should be paid for anti racist, design justice work in academia, especially if they’re BIPOC.
GRASSROOTS ORGANIZING
Many students have already initiated calls for change from the bottom up. In Fall 2020, architecture students and alumni across so-called Canada gathered for a cross-institutional dialogue about ongoing movements for equity and justice in design education. Representatives from student-led groups joined from 10 universities across to question and challenge the status quo. All student representatives were also racialized women and gender non-conforming folks, which was an enlightening moment in showcasing who is often forced to take on the brunt of the burden in instigating institutional change. Some key takeaways included shared experiences of villainization for students speaking up at their respectful institution, demanding curricular content outside the Western Canon, gender disparaties within the field, lack of recognition received by Black students in architecture, and wealth disparity among the student body due to significant extra costs involved in design education. Significant barriers identified included a lack of formal data sets and statistics collected on race within the country to reference demographics within academia and the larger profession. The biggest takeaway was that successful organizing, beyond disrupting the status quo, is also about building shared networks and stewarding new communities based on shared values.
STUDENT-LED GROUPS CALLING FOR CHANGE IN SO-CALLED CANADA:
Dalhousie University: Where is Dal Arch
McGill University: Race/Space reading group
Carleton University: .dwg (ASAU Diversity Working Group)
Toronto Metropolitan University: DAS Anti-Racism Call (DAS-ARC)
University of Toronto: Student Equity Alliance
University of Waterloo: Treaty Lands, Global Stories
University of Manitoba: Indigenous Design and Planning Student Association
University of Calgary: Advocates for Equitable Design Education
University of British Columbia: National Organization of Minority Architecture Students chapter
*Data is not available for Laurentian University, Universite de Montreal, University de Laval, and the online program by RAIC through Athabasca University.
Source: “Breaking Foundations Event Summary” by Niara van Gaalen (https://www.designwithcolour.org/articles/breaking-foundations-event-summary)
BARRIERS TO ACADEMIC ORGANIZING IN SO-CALLED CANADA
Nationwide support systems and resources for architecture students are not sufficient
There is a limit as to how much architecture organizations and associations (academic, professional, etc) are present for the student. There is a lack of a third-party/grassroots-level collective that students and others involved in academic space to tap into and mobilise through. What is currently existing does have a huge influence on the very few architecture school within the country. Despite having a handful of institutions, we are divided more than ever.
Limitations to alternative pathways (not acknowledged or supported by nation-wide academic organizations)
Part of what is demanded in architecture associations and their licensure requirements, it leaves no room for students to work within a flexible space as to how we, and the community, can become designers and advocates for the built environment. This is one of the many reasons why the academic systems and pedagogy today is so limited and restrictive -leaving students frustrated both academically and professional
Institutional Barriers
Being involved within institutions is also limiting in various ways as they are tied to the government and private donors. This sometimes leads to academic organizing in a loop/circle where nothing that has been demanded can ever change as the institution itself cannot (or more accurately) wishes not to. Since this all stems from a long-history of oppressive systems, institutions do not see the issue with it as they still benefit and profit off of how they currently operate.
Limitations of a Service-based industry
Similar to the above. The profession itself has been built on specific systems that limit the design community within it. It rarely changes in theory and practice which feeds into the way licensure and accreditation organization oversee things which feeds into what institutions deliver as their pedagogy. There is a cycle that is difficult to stop if there is no change/pressure/action done at the level of nationwide organizations and associations (especially accreditation).
Other barriers consistently found in all design institutions also include:
Crowded Curriculum/ Academic Burnout
Overstretched Capacity
Faculty Tenure / Faculty Politics
Timing & Commitment
INSTITUTIONAL ORGANIZING
While grassroots organizing is often given the advantage of knowing the individuals at stake, their culture, and the ways in which their political environment will directly affect those who need change, its collaboration with institutional organizing must be done in a way that retains the integrity of the process. Institutions, legitimized by their social and societal power, are often spaces which freeze power relations. In this sense, it is understandable for many to question how an institution, which is bound to sustain the status quo, could ever enact changes against itself.
Following the rise of protests in 2020, many educational and governmental institutions began initiatives trying to tackling social and existential issues. At Waterloo, this spurred the beginning of the Racial Equity and Environmental Justice Task Force as a group embodied within the university’s system that was meant to uphold the changes demanded by the student body, faculty, staff, and alumna. At other Canadian and American institutions, similar groups followed suit, and so the summer of petitioning for change with colleagues and superiors alike who had previous ignored these issues (and some who had not) ramped up in involvement.
With many of these changes came understandable skepticism. The truth of the matter is that not all institutional organizations are created in the same light. In order for institutional organizations to truly make great strides, it must retain good relations with grassroot organizations to ensure that they are doing more than lip service. With this said, we cannot discount the immeasurable potential that there is in having institutionalized organizations in place as a measure for ensuring that many of the calls to action demanded by grassroots organizations are implemented in a structural framework which reaches all the confines of an institution. In order to enact meaningful change, grassroots organizers must proceed with caution while interacting with institutional bodies and demand for as much transparency and accountability in collaborative processes.
DAP ACADEMIC ORGANIZING
Academic Organizing serves as a resource and support space for students and alumni organizing and demanding a transformation in their design education, with the goal of building a coalition for all schools coming together to organize for change within academia.
Design Education Unconference
The Design Education Unconference, held on August 29th, 2020, was a space for students and alumni organizing to transform their universities to discuss and learn from each other. Topics and questions for discussion were submitted by the conference participants, and through this, participants discussed and shared successes, challenges, and frustrations. Conversations revolved around studio culture and the way you’re looked down on for not sacrificing everything for study and the need around the need to decode your universities’ bylaws to start establishing student presence in the administration. Participants talked about feeling the pressure of being the only BIPOC in a space, how we can start to build coalitions, and very importantly, how to continue the momentum of organizing: keeping structures fluid to accommodate different levels of commitment, celebrating small victories, and remembering that we’re not alone!DAPxAIAS Grassroots
Presented to students at AIAS Grassroots Conference and provided academic organizing resources. Shared overview of what DAP AO has been able to accomplish to date and what we had learned over a year’s worth of organizing and community building. Additionally provided strategies for students to organize toward Design Justice in their respective institutional spaces.DAPxEGDE Design Education Actions Survey
Co-created by Design as Protest Academic Organizing x Emergent Grounds for Design Education As the movement for Black liberation and protests against state-sanctioned violence rose to mainstream attention in 2020, the design’s field complicity in upholding white supremacy was also revealed. The complicity starts with our design education. Concurrent with activism happening across the nation, students and alumni made demands that academic institutions be held accountable for perpetuating White Settler Design Culture. The survey collected data from universities with student demands and ask: What steps have been taken? Have they been effective? What’s next? In addition to helping answer these questions and cataloging the responses to these calls to action, the survey was used to help compile an Actions Resource Index. Students, alumni, faculty, staff, and admin completed this survey. 73 respondents from 42 institutions across (Turtle Island) the U.S. and Canada.
22% = faculty and/or administrators 21% = alumni 57% = current students
45% of respondents had mixed feelings on their satisfaction with their institution’s response.
91% of respondents have not been compensated for their work.
2.9/5 = average rating of respondents’ confidence in their institution’s capacity to change
20 respondents voiced that they were struggling to maintain momentum
DAPxEGDE SURVEY - COMMON CALLS TO ACTION IDENTIFIED:78.9%: remove whiteness as the standard and integrate diverse voices, design, research, and theory in existing and new courses/lectures.
71.9%: Center the learning of design justice and equitable design in existing and new courses/lectures.71.9%: Increase representation of faculty, staff, admin, and teaching assistants.
71,9%: Putting funding towards BIPOC students and initiatives.
66.7%: Acknowledge harm done and address culture of white supremacy.
CONSTRUCTING A CAMPAIGN
WHO IS DOING THE WORK?
Many people have already initiated impressive efforts locally and nationwide. This list is intended as a starting point for reference and is not intended to serve as an exhaustive resource.
PRACTICES, ORGANIZATIONS, AND COLLECTIVES:
In Kitchener/Waterloo/Cambridge: O:SE KENHIONHATA:TIE LAND BACK CAMP + Waterloo Region Yes in My Backyard + Community Fridge Kitchener
In Ontario: Disability Justice of Ontario + Ontario Coalition Against Poverty + Greenest City + Hamilton Centre For Civic Inclusion + Architecture Lobby TO + Shelter Movers of Toronto
In Canada: Building Equality in Architecture (Toronto, Atlantic, Calgary, West, Prairies, North) + Community Fridges Community Organizations (Toronto, Calgary, Regina, Hamilton, Kitchener, Vancouver), Tiny House Warriors, Hogan’s Alley Society, Africville Museum
PEOPLE:
In Kitchener/Waterloo/Cambridge: Phil Monture, Amy Smoke, Niara van Gaalen (Design with Colour), “Treaty Lands, Global Stories” organizers
In Ontario: Camille Mitchell, Dori Tunstall, Eladia Smoke, Tammy Gaber, David Fortin, Amina Lalor, Reza Nik (Arch Lobby TO chapter co-steward), Syrus Marcus Ware, Luke Anderson, Yogi Acharya, Rinaldo Walcott
In Canada: Sierra Tasi Baker, Sabrina Jafralie, Reanna Merasty, Naomi Ratte, Lorna Crowshoe, Eddie Carvery, Ra’anaa Brown
IDENTITY-BASED ORGANIZATIONS
BAIDA | IG: @BAIDA | https://www.baida.ca/Black Architects and Interior Designers Association (BAIDA) is a non profit organization made up of 100 students, planners, interior designers, and architects. BAIDA aims to support diversity, equity and inclusion in the profession of architecture and interior design. Our tools are advocacy, mentorship, networking, and outreach. In doing so, BAIDA can begin to address the issues of inequitable outcomes and a lack of diversity within the architecture and design industry.
BIDC | IG: @bidc.ca | https://www.bidc.ca/Black + Indigenous Design Collective works towards the advancement of Black & Indigenous people in spatial design disciplines & public art in British Columbia.
br.IDEAS | IG: TBDThe Brazilian Interior Designers, Engineers and Architects Society (br.IDEAS) is a group of Brazilian professionals working in the Construction Industry in Toronto and Region. Among us we have Interior Designers, Engineers, Architects, Technologist and Technicians. Our goal is to create and strengthen networking, creating a place for sharing professional experiences and as well as a place of support for our fellow compatriots.
CNIEA | https://nciea.net/A non-profit network of Iraqi Engineers and Architects (E&A) who live and work in Canada. Some of us are P.Eng. Engineers or Licensed Architects, others are Intern Architects or E.I.T Engineers. Our goal is to have all our members to be fully licensed. The CNIEA web site members are volunteer administrators who have worked together to take CNIEA to new heights in its relatively short life.
SOSA | IG: @sosa_toronto | https://www.sosatoronto.ca/We are a not-for-profit organization that aims to embrace and promote a culture of diversity, equity, and inclusion in the professions of architecture and design. SOSA’s members are students, volunteers, professionals, and newcomers who self-identify as South Asian or are of South Asian origin.
Students at UWSA have been questioning the status quo for many years. Plugging into existing efforts when they exist is often among the most effective strategies for effecting change. Building solidarity and networks across existing groups has also historically led to amazing initiatives being realized at UWSA (e.g. summer 2020 street mural with demands by “The Collective Resistance” / Treaty Lands, Global Stories x Sustainability Collective), and coalition building is often cited more broadly as a powerful way to garner grassroots power.
SOME [NON-EXHAUSTIVE] HIGHLIGHTS OF EXISTING STUDENT ORGANIZING AT UWSA:
BRIDGE | Founded bin 2012 to engage UWSA with the wider Cambridge community through design.
On Empathy | Founded by Amrit Phull and Connor O’Grady. Creates conversations for students to reflect, discuss, listen, and engage in collaborative informal conversations and workshops surrounding becoming empathetic + self-aware designers.
Treaty Lands, Global Stories | Founded by Amina Lalor, Paniz Moayeri, and Samuel Ganton in 2016. The initiative aimed to diversify the University of Waterloo School of Architecture’s eurocentric curriculum and has since expanded to a wide array of justice-oriented initiatives relevant to architecture students.
Sustainability Collective | Founded by Omar Ferwati in 2017 to address UWSA’s sustainability practices, inclusion of climate crisis-related material in the curriculum, and for challenging the broader role of the design industry in the ongoing climate crisis.galt | Student-run design publication at UWSA founded in 2017. It has become a platform through which the architectural canon can be questioned.
Mentorship for Architecture Peers | Peer-to-peer mentoring program founded in 2018. Provides younger students with peer support from upper year undergraduates and masters students.
The Collective Resistance | In 2020, TLGS x Sustainability Collective created a street mural outside UWSA’s Galt campus as a call to “resist the institutional racism, classism, homophobia, sexism, and ableism within the School of Waterloo and the wider architectural profession.”
JOIN DESIGN AS PROTEST
www.dapcollective.com/get-involved
Join Our Core Organizers. We are seeking Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) design activists to join our organizing team and help us mobilize direct actions across design agencies, universities, and member organizations.
Engage Direct Actions. We are developing a wealth of action campaigns that we will mobilize people to help us implement. Let us know that you would like to help.
Amplify Storytelling & Media Campaigns. Join us across social media via #designasprotest to share, support, and amplify the design justice demands, direct actions, and digital narrative campaigns.
Contribute to Research & Data. Work with the team to build out datasets that reveal the design field’s impact on systemic injustices across individual and systemic scales.